Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Aglianico vs Cabernet Sauvignon

How Aglianico and Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Aglianico has more earthy character; Aglianico has more acidity.

Choose

Aglianico

Choose Aglianico if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fruitier, more aromatic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Aglianicolow (1/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Aglianicotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Aglianico is earthier: medium-plus against low-medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Aglianicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Aglianico is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Aglianicotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Aglianico is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Aglianicotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Aglianicomedium (3/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionAglianicoCabernet Sauvignon
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, plum, leather, tobacco, ashblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, graphite, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more