Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Argentine Malbec vs Red Bordeaux

How Argentine Malbec and Red Bordeaux differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Argentine Malbec and Red Bordeaux are both made from Malbec, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Argentine Malbec has more floral character; Argentine Malbec has more fruit intensity; Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Argentine Malbec

Choose Argentine Malbec if you want something more floral, fruitier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green, earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Argentine Malbectypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Red Bordeauxlow (1/5)

Argentine Malbec is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Argentine Malbectypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Argentine Malbec is fruitier: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Argentine Malbeclow (1/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Argentine Malbeclow (1/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Bordeaux is earthier: medium against low.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Argentine Malbectypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Argentine Malbec is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Argentine Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Red Bordeaux is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Spice: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionArgentine MalbecRed Bordeaux
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black plum, violet, cocoa, blueberryblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more