Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Argentine Malbec vs Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

How Argentine Malbec and Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Argentine Malbec has more floral character; Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Argentine Malbec has more spice.

Choose

Argentine Malbec

Choose Argentine Malbec if you want something more floral, spicier, fuller and richer.

Choose

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Argentine Malbectypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Argentine Malbec is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Argentine Malbeclow (1/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Argentine Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Argentine Malbec is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Argentine Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Argentine Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Argentine Malbectypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Argentine Malbec is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionArgentine MalbecCoonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black plum, violet, cocoa, blueberrycassis, mint, eucalyptus, blackcurrant leaf, cedar

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more