Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Argentine Malbec vs Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

How Argentine Malbec and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Argentine Malbec has more floral character; Argentine Malbec has more spice; Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon has more tannin.

Choose

Argentine Malbec

Choose Argentine Malbec if you want something more floral, spicier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Argentine Malbectypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Argentine Malbec is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Argentine Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Argentine Malbec is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Argentine Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Argentine Malbectypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Argentine Malbectypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Argentine Malbectypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Argentine Malbec is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionArgentine MalbecSonoma Cabernet Sauvignon
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, black plum, violet, cocoa, blueberryblack cherry, cassis, cedar, vanilla, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more