Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Australian Grenache vs Hawke’s Bay Syrah

How Australian Grenache and Hawke’s Bay Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Australian Grenache and Hawke’s Bay Syrah are the same variety under two names, so the difference is about where it is grown, how it is made and what each name has come to signal — not about the grape. The main differences: Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more savoury character; Australian Grenache has more herbal / green character; Hawke’s Bay Syrah has more spice.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Australian Grenache

Choose Australian Grenache if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Hawke’s Bay Syrah

Choose Hawke’s Bay Syrah if you want something more savoury, spicier, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Australian Grenachelow-medium (2/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Australian Grenachetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahlow (1/5)

Australian Grenache is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Australian Grenachetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is spicier: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Australian Grenachetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Australian Grenachetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Hawke’s Bay Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Hawke’s Bay Syrah is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionAustralian GrenacheHawke’s Bay Syrah
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, raspberry, rose, white pepper, dried herbsblackberry, black pepper, violet, olive, plum

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more