Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Australian Pinot Noir vs Red Burgundy

How Australian Pinot Noir and Red Burgundy differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Australian Pinot Noir and Red Burgundy are both made from Pinot Noir, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Red Burgundy has more floral character; Red Burgundy has more acidity; Australian Pinot Noir has more alcohol.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Australian Pinot Noir

Choose Australian Pinot Noir if you want something stronger and warmer, fruitier.

Choose

Red Burgundy

Choose Red Burgundy if you want something more floral, fresher and more acidic, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Australian Pinot Noirlow (1/5)
Red Burgundytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Burgundy is more floral: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Australian Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Red Burgundytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Red Burgundy is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Australian Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Red Burgundytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Australian Pinot Noir is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Australian Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Red Burgundytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Australian Pinot Noir is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Australian Pinot Noirtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Red Burgundytypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Burgundy is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Australian Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Red Burgundytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Red Burgundy is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Body: Similar — both medium.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionAustralian Pinot NoirRed Burgundy
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, raspberry, rhubarb, clove, forest floorred cherry, raspberry, forest floor, mushroom, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more