Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barbaresco vs Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

How Barbaresco and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Barbaresco and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Barbaresco has more floral character; Barbaresco has more aromatic intensity; Barbaresco has more tannin.

Choose

Barbaresco

Choose Barbaresco if you want something more floral, more aromatic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something fruitier, more savoury, rounder and creamier in texture.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Barbarescotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Barbaresco is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Barbarescotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionemedium (3/5)

Barbaresco is more aromatic: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barbarescotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barbaresco is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barbarescotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Barbarescotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Barbarescotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBarbarescoChianti Classico Gran Selezione
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, rose, tar, liquorice, dried herbsblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more