Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barbaresco vs Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

How Barbaresco and Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Barbaresco has more floral character; Barbaresco has more earthy character; Barbaresco has more aromatic intensity.

Choose

Barbaresco

Choose Barbaresco if you want something more floral, earthier, more aromatic.

Choose

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Barbarescotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Barbaresco is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barbarescotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Barbaresco is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Barbarescotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignonmedium (3/5)

Barbaresco is more aromatic: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Barbarescolow (1/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barbarescotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Barbaresco is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barbarescotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barbaresco is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Spice: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBarbarescoCoonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, rose, tar, liquorice, dried herbscassis, mint, eucalyptus, blackcurrant leaf, cedar

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more