Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barbera d’Asti vs Barbera

How Barbera d’Asti and Barbera differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Barbera d’Asti and Barbera are both made from Barbera, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Barbera d’Asti has more body.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Barbera d’Asti

Choose Barbera d’Asti if you want something fuller and richer.

Choose

Barbera

Choose Barbera if you prefer its flavour profile — sour cherry, blackberry, plum.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Barbera d’Astitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Barberatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Barbera d’Asti is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both low-medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBarbera d’AstiBarbera
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, plum, dried herbs, liquoricesour cherry, blackberry, plum, violet, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more