Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barbera vs Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

How Barbera and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Barbera and Vino Nobile di Montepulciano come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more tannin; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more earthy character; Vino Nobile di Montepulciano has more body.

Choose

Barbera

Choose Barbera if you want something fruitier, fresher.

Choose

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano

Choose Vino Nobile di Montepulciano if you want something more tannic and structured, earthier, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barberatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against low-medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barberalow (1/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is earthier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Barberatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barberatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Barbera is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Barberatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Vino Nobile di Montepulciano is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barberatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Vino Nobile di Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barbera is fresher: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBarberaVino Nobile di Montepulciano
Tannintypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, plum, violet, liquoricesour cherry, plum, dried herbs, leather, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more