Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barbera vs Montepulciano

How Barbera and Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Barbera and Montepulciano come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Barbera has more acidity; Barbera has more perceived freshness; Montepulciano has more tannin.

Choose

Barbera

Choose Barbera if you want something fresher and more acidic, fresher, more oaky.

Choose

Montepulciano

Choose Montepulciano if you want something more tannic and structured, fuller and richer, rounder and creamier in texture.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barberatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Barbera is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barberatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Barbera is fresher: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barberatypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Montepulciano is more tannic and structured: medium against low-medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Barberatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Barberatypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulcianotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Barbera is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Barberatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Montepulciano is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBarberaMontepulciano
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at13–15°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, plum, dried herbs, licoriceblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more