Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barolo vs Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

How Barolo and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Barolo and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Barolo has more floral character; Barolo has more aromatic intensity; Barolo has more spice.

Choose

Barolo

Choose Barolo if you want something more floral, more aromatic, spicier.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something fruitier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Barolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Barolo is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionemedium (3/5)

Barolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Barolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Barolo is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barolo is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Barolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBaroloChianti Classico Gran Selezione
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, truffle, dried herbsblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more