Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barolo vs Saperavi

How Barolo and Saperavi differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Barolo has more floral character; Barolo has more aromatic intensity; Saperavi has more sweetness.

Choose

Barolo

Choose Barolo if you want something more floral, more aromatic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Saperavi

Choose Saperavi if you want something sweeter, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Barolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Saperavilow (1/5)

Barolo is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Saperavimedium (3/5)

Barolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Barololow (1/5)
Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Saperavi is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barolo is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barolotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Saperavi is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Barolotypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Barolo is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Spice: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBaroloSaperavi
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, truffle, dried herbsdamson, sour plum, blackcurrant, liquorice, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more