Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barolo vs Taurasi

How Barolo and Taurasi differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Barolo and Taurasi come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Barolo has more floral character; Barolo has more aromatic intensity.

Choose

Barolo

Choose Barolo if you want something more floral, more aromatic.

Choose

Taurasi

Choose Taurasi if you prefer its flavour profile — black cherry, plum, leather.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Barolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Taurasilow (1/5)

Barolo is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Taurasimedium (3/5)

Barolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both high.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBaroloTaurasi
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, truffle, dried herbsblack cherry, plum, leather, ash, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more