Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barolo vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Barolo and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Barolo has more floral character; Barolo has more earthy character; Barolo has more aromatic intensity.

Choose

Barolo

Choose Barolo if you want something more floral, earthier, more aromatic.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Barolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Barolo is more floral: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Barolo is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannatmedium (3/5)

Barolo is more aromatic: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Barolo is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Barolotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barolo is more tannic and structured: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Barolotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Spice: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBaroloUruguayan Tannat
Floral charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)medium (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, rose, tar, truffle, dried herbsblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more