Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barossa Shiraz vs Red Bordeaux

How Barossa Shiraz and Red Bordeaux differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Barossa Shiraz has more fruit intensity; Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character; Red Bordeaux has more earthy character.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something fruitier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green, earthier, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Barossa Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Barossa Shirazlow (1/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barossa Shirazlow (1/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Bordeaux is earthier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barossa Shiraztypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Red Bordeaux is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Barossa Shiraz is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Red Bordeaux is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Spice: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBarossa ShirazRed Bordeaux
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanillablackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more