Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barossa Shiraz vs Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

How Barossa Shiraz and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more earthy character; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more acidity; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more savoury character.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barossa Shirazlow (1/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Barossa Shiraz is spicier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barossa Shiraztypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBarossa ShirazChianti Classico Gran Selezione
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanillablack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more