Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barossa Shiraz vs Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon

How Barossa Shiraz and Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Barossa Shiraz has more spice; Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon has more acidity.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Choose

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Barossa Shirazlow (1/5)
Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chilean Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Barossa Shiraz is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chilean Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chilean Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBarossa ShirazChilean Cabernet Sauvignon
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanillacassis, black cherry, mint, eucalyptus, cedar

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more