Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barossa Shiraz vs Jumilla Monastrell

How Barossa Shiraz and Jumilla Monastrell differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Barossa Shiraz and Jumilla Monastrell are both made from Grenache, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Jumilla Monastrell has more earthy character; Barossa Shiraz has more body; Barossa Shiraz has more fruit intensity.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier, more oaky.

Choose

Jumilla Monastrell

Choose Jumilla Monastrell if you want something earthier, more savoury, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Barossa Shirazlow (1/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Jumilla Monastrell is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Barossa Shiraz is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Jumilla Monastrell is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barossa Shiraztypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Jumilla Monastrell is fresher: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBarossa ShirazJumilla Monastrell
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanillablackberry, plum, earth, game, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more