Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barossa Shiraz vs Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

How Barossa Shiraz and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Barossa Shiraz has more spice; Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon has more perceived freshness; Barossa Shiraz has more texture.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something spicier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Choose

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Barossa Shiraz is spicier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barossa Shiraztypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher: medium against low-medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Body: Similar — both high.

Full side by side

DimensionBarossa ShirazSonoma Cabernet Sauvignon
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanillablack cherry, cassis, cedar, vanilla, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more