Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Barossa Shiraz vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Barossa Shiraz and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Uruguayan Tannat has more acidity; Barossa Shiraz has more alcohol; Barossa Shiraz has more fruit intensity.

Choose

Barossa Shiraz

Choose Barossa Shiraz if you want something stronger and warmer, fruitier, more oaky.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something fresher and more acidic, more savoury, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Barossa Shiraztypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Barossa Shiraz is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Barossa Shiraz is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Barossa Shiraztypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Barossa Shiraztypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fresher: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBarossa ShirazUruguayan Tannat
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackberry, plum, dark chocolate, liquorice, vanillablackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more