Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Beaujolais vs Cru Beaujolais

Is a named cru worth several times the price of basic Beaujolais?

The short answer

Beaujolais and Cru Beaujolais are both made from Gamay, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Cru Beaujolais has more earthy character; Cru Beaujolais has more tannin; Cru Beaujolais has more body.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Beaujolais

Choose Beaujolais if you prefer its flavour profile — red cherry, raspberry, banana.

Choose

Cru Beaujolais

Choose Cru Beaujolais if you want something earthier, more tannic and structured, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Beaujolaislow (1/5)
Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is earthier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Beaujolaistypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more tannic and structured: medium against low-medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Beaujolaistypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is fuller and richer: medium against low-medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Beaujolaislow-medium (2/5)
Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more savoury: medium against low-medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Cru Beaujolaistypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Cru Beaujolais is more floral: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Beaujolaistypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Cru Beaujolaistypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cru Beaujolais is rounder and creamier in texture: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBeaujolaisCru Beaujolais
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury characterlow-medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at12–14°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursred cherry, raspberry, banana, bubblegum, violetdark cherry, violet, granite, raspberry, iris

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more