Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Bekaa Valley Red vs Red Bordeaux

How Bekaa Valley Red and Red Bordeaux differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Bekaa Valley Red and Red Bordeaux are both made from Cabernet Sauvignon, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character; Bekaa Valley Red has more fruit intensity; Bekaa Valley Red has more spice.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Bekaa Valley Red

Choose Bekaa Valley Red if you want something fruitier, spicier, earthier.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green, fresher.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Bekaa Valley Redlow (1/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Bekaa Valley Redmedium (3/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Red Bordeaux is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionBekaa Valley RedRed Bordeaux
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, thyme, cedar, leatherblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more