Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Bekaa Valley Red vs Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

How Bekaa Valley Red and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Bekaa Valley Red and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon are both made from Cabernet Sauvignon, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Bekaa Valley Red has more spice; Bekaa Valley Red has more earthy character; Bekaa Valley Red has more acidity.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Bekaa Valley Red

Choose Bekaa Valley Red if you want something spicier, earthier, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something stronger and warmer, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Bekaa Valley Red is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Bekaa Valley Redtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionBekaa Valley RedSonoma Cabernet Sauvignon
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnessmedium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdried cherry, fig, thyme, cedar, leatherblack cherry, cassis, cedar, vanilla, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more