Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs California Pinot Noir

How Blaufränkisch and California Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Blaufränkisch has more acidity; Blaufränkisch has more tannin; California Pinot Noir has more body.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, spicier.

Choose

California Pinot Noir

Choose California Pinot Noir if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Blaufränkischtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

California Pinot Noir is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

California Pinot Noir is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
California Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischCalifornia Pinot Noir
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetdark cherry, raspberry, cola, baking spice, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more