Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs Chianti Classico Riserva

How Blaufränkisch and Chianti Classico Riserva differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Blaufränkisch has more spice; Chianti Classico Riserva has more savoury character; Chianti Classico Riserva has more herbal / green character.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something spicier, fruitier.

Choose

Chianti Classico Riserva

Choose Chianti Classico Riserva if you want something more savoury, more herbal and green, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Riservalow (1/5)

Blaufränkisch is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more savoury: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Chianti Classico Riservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Riserva is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both high.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischChianti Classico Riserva
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetsour cherry, leather, dried herbs, tobacco, balsamic

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more