Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs Southern Rhône blend

How Blaufränkisch and Southern Rhône blend differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Southern Rhône blend has more herbal / green character; Blaufränkisch has more acidity; Blaufränkisch has more tannin.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured, more oaky.

Choose

Southern Rhône blend

Choose Southern Rhône blend if you want something more herbal and green, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Blaufränkischtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Southern Rhône blend is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Blaufränkisch is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Southern Rhône blendtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischSouthern Rhône blend
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetred plum, strawberry, dried herbs, black pepper, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more