Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Blaufränkisch vs Cabernet Sauvignon

How Blaufränkisch and Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Blaufränkisch has more acidity; Cabernet Sauvignon has more body.

Choose

Blaufränkisch

Choose Blaufränkisch if you want something fresher and more acidic, spicier, earthier.

Choose

Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fuller and richer, more aromatic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Blaufränkischlow (1/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Blaufränkischtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Blaufränkisch is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Blaufränkischmedium (3/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Blaufränkischtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Blaufränkisch is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Blaufränkischtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Blaufränkisch is earthier: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionBlaufränkischCabernet Sauvignon
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at14–16°C15–17°C
Typical flavourssour cherry, blackberry, black pepper, graphite, violetblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, graphite, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more