Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Red Bordeaux vs California Cabernet Sauvignon

How Red Bordeaux and California Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Red Bordeaux and California Cabernet Sauvignon are both made from Cabernet Sauvignon, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: California Cabernet Sauvignon has more fruit intensity; Red Bordeaux has more savoury character; Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more savoury, more herbal and green, spicier.

Choose

California Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose California Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
California Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

California Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
California Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Red Bordeaux is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
California Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
California Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
California Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is earthier: medium against low.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
California Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Red Bordeaux is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionRed BordeauxCalifornia Cabernet Sauvignon
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobaccoblack cherry, cassis, vanilla, mocha, plum

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more