Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Red Bordeaux vs Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

How Red Bordeaux and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character; Red Bordeaux has more spice; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more acidity.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green, spicier.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something fresher and more acidic, fruitier, more savoury.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is more savoury: high against medium-plus.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionRed BordeauxChianti Classico Gran Selezione
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobaccoblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more