Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Red Bordeaux vs Saperavi

How Red Bordeaux and Saperavi differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character; Saperavi has more sweetness; Saperavi has more acidity.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green, more oaky.

Choose

Saperavi

Choose Saperavi if you want something sweeter, fresher and more acidic, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavilow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Red Bordeauxlow (1/5)
Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Saperavi is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Saperavitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Saperavi is fresher and more acidic: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Saperavi is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Red Bordeaux is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Saperavitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Saperavi is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionRed BordeauxSaperavi
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobaccodamson, sour plum, blackcurrant, liquorice, tobacco

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more