Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Red Bordeaux vs Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

How Red Bordeaux and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Red Bordeaux and Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon are both made from Cabernet Sauvignon, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon has more fruit intensity; Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character; Red Bordeaux has more spice.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, earthier.

Choose

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something fruitier, stronger and warmer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: high against medium.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Bordeaux is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignontypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Sonoma Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionRed BordeauxSonoma Cabernet Sauvignon
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobaccoblack cherry, cassis, cedar, vanilla, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more