Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Red Bordeaux vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Red Bordeaux and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character; Red Bordeaux has more earthy character; Uruguayan Tannat has more body.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green, earthier, fresher.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something fuller and richer, fruitier, rounder and creamier in texture.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is earthier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Red Bordeaux is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionRed BordeauxUruguayan Tannat
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobaccoblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more