Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Red Bordeaux vs Washington Syrah

How Red Bordeaux and Washington Syrah differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Washington Syrah has more floral character; Red Bordeaux has more herbal / green character; Washington Syrah has more fruit intensity.

Choose

Red Bordeaux

Choose Red Bordeaux if you want something more herbal and green.

Choose

Washington Syrah

Choose Washington Syrah if you want something more floral, fruitier, spicier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Red Bordeauxlow (1/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Washington Syrah is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahlow (1/5)

Red Bordeaux is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Washington Syrah is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Washington Syrah is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is earthier: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Red Bordeauxtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Washington Syrahtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Washington Syrah is rounder and creamier in texture: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionRed BordeauxWashington Syrah
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, plum, cedar, graphite, tobaccoblackberry, black pepper, olive, smoked meat, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more