Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Sauvignon vs Cabernet Franc

Parent and offspring, sharing half a name — how different are they really?

The short answer

Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Franc come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Cabernet Franc has more floral character; Cabernet Sauvignon has more spice; Cabernet Sauvignon has more tannin.

Choose

Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something spicier, more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Cabernet Franc

Choose Cabernet Franc if you want something more floral.

Worth knowing

Cabernet Franc is one of Cabernet Sauvignon’s two parents, which is why the family resemblance is real rather than imagined. The offspring is denser, later-ripening and more tannic; the parent is lighter, earlier and more aromatic, and keeps a leafy, red-fruited character the child mostly lost.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Franc is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Cabernet Franclow (1/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is spicier: medium against low.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Cabernet Franctypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet SauvignonCabernet Franc
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, graphite, tobaccoraspberry, red plum, graphite, bell pepper, violet

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more