Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Sauvignon vs Montepulciano

How Cabernet Sauvignon and Montepulciano differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Cabernet Sauvignon has more spice; Cabernet Sauvignon has more acidity.

Choose

Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, fresher and more acidic.

Choose

Montepulciano

Choose Montepulciano if you prefer its flavour profile — black plum, blackberry, dried herbs.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Montepulcianolow (1/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is spicier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Montepulcianotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Montepulcianomedium (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)
Montepulcianotypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet SauvignonMontepulciano
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Earthy charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, graphite, tobaccoblack plum, blackberry, dried herbs, liquorice, cocoa

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more