Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Sauvignon vs Pinot Noir

How Cabernet Sauvignon and Pinot Noir differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Cabernet Sauvignon and Pinot Noir come from the same country but sit in different territory. The main differences: Pinot Noir has more floral character; Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Pinot Noir has more earthy character.

Choose

Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, more tannic and structured, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Pinot Noir

Choose Pinot Noir if you want something more floral, earthier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Pinot Noir is more floral: medium against low.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Pinot Noirlow (1/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)

Pinot Noir is earthier: medium-plus against low-medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is stronger and warmer: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Pinot Noirtypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is fuller and richer: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Spice: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet SauvignonPinot Noir
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Serve at15–17°C14–16°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, graphite, tobaccored cherry, raspberry, strawberry, forest floor, mushroom

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more