Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cabernet Sauvignon vs Zinfandel

How Cabernet Sauvignon and Zinfandel differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Cabernet Sauvignon has more herbal / green character; Zinfandel has more sweetness; Cabernet Sauvignon has more acidity.

Choose

Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something more herbal and green, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Choose

Zinfandel

Choose Zinfandel if you want something sweeter, stronger and warmer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Zinfandellow (1/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Zinfandeltypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)

Zinfandel is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Cabernet Sauvignon is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Zinfandel is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Zinfandeltypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Zinfandel is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Perceived freshness: Similar — both medium.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCabernet SauvignonZinfandel
Herbal / green charactertypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low-medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low to high (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, graphite, tobaccoblackberry, raspberry jam, black pepper, cinnamon, raisin

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more