Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Cahors vs Uruguayan Tannat

How Cahors and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Cahors and Uruguayan Tannat are both made from Tannat, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Cahors has more earthy character; Cahors has more floral character; Uruguayan Tannat has more spice.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Cahors

Choose Cahors if you want something earthier, more floral.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something spicier, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Cahorstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Cahors is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Cahorstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

Cahors is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Cahorslow (1/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is spicier: medium against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Cahorstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Cahorstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Cahorstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionCahorsUruguayan Tannat
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Floral charactertypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)low (1/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursdamson, blackberry, tobacco, iron, graphiteblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more