Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

California Cabernet Sauvignon vs Super Tuscan

How California Cabernet Sauvignon and Super Tuscan differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

California Cabernet Sauvignon and Super Tuscan are both made from Cabernet Sauvignon, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Super Tuscan has more herbal / green character; Super Tuscan has more spice; California Cabernet Sauvignon has more sweetness.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

California Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose California Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something sweeter.

Choose

Super Tuscan

Choose Super Tuscan if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

California Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is more herbal and green: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

California Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Super Tuscan is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Super Tuscanlow (1/5)

California Cabernet Sauvignon is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Super Tuscantypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Super Tuscan is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Super Tuscantypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Super Tuscan is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCalifornia Cabernet SauvignonSuper Tuscan
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, cassis, vanilla, mocha, plumblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, mint, vanilla

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more