Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

California Cabernet Sauvignon vs Uruguayan Tannat

How California Cabernet Sauvignon and Uruguayan Tannat differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Uruguayan Tannat has more savoury character; Uruguayan Tannat has more spice; California Cabernet Sauvignon has more sweetness.

Choose

California Cabernet Sauvignon

Choose California Cabernet Sauvignon if you want something sweeter.

Choose

Uruguayan Tannat

Choose Uruguayan Tannat if you want something more savoury, spicier, fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more savoury: medium-plus against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

California Cabernet Sauvignonlow (1/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is spicier: medium against low.

Sweetness

Clear difference

Perceived sugar in the finished wine, driven mainly by residual sugar but modified by acidity, alcohol and fruit ripeness.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)
Uruguayan Tannatlow (1/5)

California Cabernet Sauvignon is sweeter: low-medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

California Cabernet Sauvignontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Uruguayan Tannattypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Uruguayan Tannat is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Herbal / green character: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionCalifornia Cabernet SauvignonUruguayan Tannat
Savoury charactertypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to low-medium (2/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium-plus, ranging from low-medium to high (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, cassis, vanilla, mocha, plumblackberry, plum, liquorice, cocoa, dried herb

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more