Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chilean Carmenère vs Morgon

How Chilean Carmenère and Morgon differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chilean Carmenère has more herbal / green character; Chilean Carmenère has more spice; Morgon has more earthy character.

Choose

Chilean Carmenère

Choose Chilean Carmenère if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, more oaky.

Choose

Morgon

Choose Morgon if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more aromatic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Morgonlow (1/5)

Chilean Carmenère is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Morgonlow (1/5)

Chilean Carmenère is spicier: medium against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chilean Carmenèrelow (1/5)
Morgontypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Morgon is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Morgon is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Aromatic intensity

Clear difference

How strongly the wine smells before it is tasted. Some grapes are intrinsically aromatic; others express mainly on the palate.

Chilean Carmenèremedium (3/5)
Morgontypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Morgon is more aromatic: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Morgontypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Chilean Carmenère is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionChilean CarmenèreMorgon
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, green peppercorn, soy, bell pepper, cocoablack cherry, kirsch, violet, earth, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more