Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chilean Carmenère vs Rioja Reserva

How Chilean Carmenère and Rioja Reserva differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chilean Carmenère has more herbal / green character; Rioja Reserva has more earthy character; Rioja Reserva has more acidity.

Choose

Chilean Carmenère

Choose Chilean Carmenère if you want something more herbal and green, fruitier.

Choose

Rioja Reserva

Choose Rioja Reserva if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Rioja Reservalow (1/5)

Chilean Carmenère is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chilean Carmenèrelow (1/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Rioja Reserva is earthier: medium against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja Reserva is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja Reserva is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Chilean Carmenère is fruitier: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Rioja Reservatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Rioja Reserva is more oaky: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionChilean CarmenèreRioja Reserva
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, green peppercorn, soy, bell pepper, cocoadried strawberry, leather, vanilla, tobacco, fig

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more