Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chilean Carmenère vs Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

How Chilean Carmenère and Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more earthy character; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more acidity; Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends has more tannin.

Choose

Chilean Carmenère

Choose Chilean Carmenère if you want something more oaky.

Choose

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends

Choose Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chilean Carmenèrelow (1/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is more tannic and structured: medium-plus against medium.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Chilean Carmenère is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Swartland Syrah and Rhône blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Swartland Syrah and Rhône blends is fresher: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChilean CarmenèreSwartland Syrah and Rhône blends
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, green peppercorn, soy, bell pepper, cocoablackberry, white pepper, fynbos, olive, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more