Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chilean Carmenère vs Naoussa Xinomavro

How Chilean Carmenère and Naoussa Xinomavro differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Chilean Carmenère has more herbal / green character; Naoussa Xinomavro has more earthy character; Naoussa Xinomavro has more acidity.

Choose

Chilean Carmenère

Choose Chilean Carmenère if you want something more herbal and green, spicier.

Choose

Naoussa Xinomavro

Choose Naoussa Xinomavro if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, more tannic and structured.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Chilean Carmenère is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chilean Carmenèrelow (1/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Tannin

Clear difference

Phenolic compounds from grape skins, seeds, stems and oak. The principal structural axis of red wine.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more tannic and structured: high against medium.

Floral character

Clear difference

Blossom, rose, violet, elderflower, acacia and related aromatic notes.

Chilean Carmenèrelow (1/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrotypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Naoussa Xinomavro is more floral: medium against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chilean Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Naoussa Xinomavrolow (1/5)

Chilean Carmenère is spicier: medium against low.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Carbonation: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionChilean CarmenèreNaoussa Xinomavro
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at15–17°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, green peppercorn, soy, bell pepper, cocoasun-dried tomato, olive, red cherry, dried herbs, leather

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more