Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Carmenère vs Nero d’Avola

How Carmenère and Nero d’Avola differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Carmenère has more herbal / green character; Nero d’Avola has more acidity; Carmenère has more savoury character.

Choose

Carmenère

Choose Carmenère if you want something more herbal and green, more savoury.

Choose

Nero d’Avola

Choose Nero d’Avola if you want something fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Carmenèretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Nero d’Avolalow (1/5)

Carmenère is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Carmenèretypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Nero d’Avola is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Savoury character

Clear difference

Non-fruit, umami-adjacent character: meat, leather, olive, soy, broth, cured notes. Often increases with age.

Carmenèretypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Nero d’Avolatypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Carmenère is more savoury: medium-plus against medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Body: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Fruit intensity: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionCarmenèreNero d’Avola
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Serve at15–17°C15–17°C
Typical flavoursblack plum, green peppercorn, soy, bell pepper, cocoablack cherry, plum, liquorice, tobacco, dried herbs

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more