Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Châteauneuf-du-Pape vs Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

How Châteauneuf-du-Pape and Chianti Classico Gran Selezione differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Châteauneuf-du-Pape has more herbal / green character; Châteauneuf-du-Pape has more spice; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more acidity.

Choose

Châteauneuf-du-Pape

Choose Châteauneuf-du-Pape if you want something more herbal and green, spicier, stronger and warmer.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something fresher and more acidic.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.
  • Earthy character: Similar — both medium-plus.

Full side by side

DimensionChâteauneuf-du-PapeChianti Classico Gran Selezione
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred plum, kirsch, dried herbs, leather, liquoriceblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espresso

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more