Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Châteauneuf-du-Pape vs Jumilla Monastrell

How Châteauneuf-du-Pape and Jumilla Monastrell differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

Châteauneuf-du-Pape and Jumilla Monastrell are both made from Grenache, so the difference is about place and winemaking rather than the grape. The main differences: Châteauneuf-du-Pape has more herbal / green character; Châteauneuf-du-Pape has more body; Châteauneuf-du-Pape has more fruit intensity.

These are the same grape

The difference here is not botanical. It comes from where the vines grow, how the wine is made and what the name has come to signal commercially — which is exactly why the two taste different in practice.

Choose

Châteauneuf-du-Pape

Choose Châteauneuf-du-Pape if you want something more herbal and green, fuller and richer, fruitier.

Choose

Jumilla Monastrell

Choose Jumilla Monastrell if you want something more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Herbal / green character

Clear difference

Herbs, grass, blackcurrant leaf, capsicum and other green notes, largely driven by methoxypyrazines and picking decisions.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Jumilla Monastrelllow (1/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is more herbal and green: medium-plus against low.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)

Jumilla Monastrell is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is spicier: medium-plus against medium.

Texture

Clear difference

Mouthfeel independent of weight — from lean and cutting through to creamy, waxy or velvety. Driven by lees contact, malolactic conversion, skin contact and ageing.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Jumilla Monastrelltypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is rounder and creamier in texture: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Acidity: Similar — both medium.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Alcohol: Similar — both high.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.

Full side by side

DimensionChâteauneuf-du-PapeJumilla Monastrell
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low to medium-plus (3/5)
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred plum, kirsch, dried herbs, leather, liquoriceblackberry, plum, earth, game, liquorice

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more