Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Châteauneuf-du-Pape vs Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

How Châteauneuf-du-Pape and Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Châteauneuf-du-Pape has more spice; Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends has more acidity; Châteauneuf-du-Pape has more alcohol.

Choose

Châteauneuf-du-Pape

Choose Châteauneuf-du-Pape if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Choose

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends

Choose Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends if you want something fresher and more acidic, more oaky.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendslow (1/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is fresher and more acidic: medium-plus against medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Fruit intensity

Clear difference

How loudly the fruit flavours speak, independent of whether they are ripe or tart.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Châteauneuf-du-Pape is fruitier: high against medium-plus.

Oak influence

Clear difference

Perceptible impact of barrel or alternative oak contact — vanilla, toast, coconut, smoke, cedar and added texture.

Châteauneuf-du-Papetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blendstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)

Stellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends is more oaky: medium against low-medium.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Savoury character: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionChâteauneuf-du-PapeStellenbosch Cabernet and Cape Bordeaux blends
Spicetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Alcoholtypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Bodytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Fruit intensitytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Oak influencetypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Herbal / green charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Savoury charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursred plum, kirsch, dried herbs, leather, liquoriceblackcurrant, black cherry, cedar, fynbos, graphite

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more