Skip to content
WineHQ
Search

Comparison

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione vs Dalmatian Plavac Mali

How Chianti Classico Gran Selezione and Dalmatian Plavac Mali differ, dimension by dimension.

The short answer

The main differences: Dalmatian Plavac Mali has more spice; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more earthy character; Chianti Classico Gran Selezione has more acidity.

Choose

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione

Choose Chianti Classico Gran Selezione if you want something earthier, fresher and more acidic, fresher.

Choose

Dalmatian Plavac Mali

Choose Dalmatian Plavac Mali if you want something spicier, stronger and warmer, fuller and richer.

Where they genuinely differ

Only differences large enough to notice in the glass are listed here. A gap of half a point on a five-point scale is noise, and WineHQ does not dress it up as a finding.

Spice

Clear difference

Pepper, clove, cinnamon and related spice notes, whether from the grape (as with rotundone in Syrah) or from oak.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionelow (1/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is spicier: medium-plus against low.

Earthy character

Clear difference

Forest floor, mushroom, wet stone, clay and undergrowth notes. Frequently, though not exclusively, associated with cooler and more traditional styles.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malilow (1/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is earthier: medium-plus against low.

Acidity

Clear difference

Total perceived acidity. Rises in cooler climates and with earlier picking; falls with heat and ripeness.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher and more acidic: high against medium.

Perceived freshness

Clear difference

The overall impression of liveliness — a composite of acidity, alcohol balance, fruit character and the absence of tiredness. Distinct from raw acidity: a wine can be high in acid yet taste heavy.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)

Chianti Classico Gran Selezione is fresher: medium-plus against low-medium.

Alcohol

Clear difference

Perceived alcoholic strength, which tracks actual ABV but is modified by sweetness, acidity and body.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is stronger and warmer: high against medium-plus.

Body

Clear difference

The overall weight and viscosity of the wine in the mouth — a composite of alcohol, sugar, extract and glycerol.

Chianti Classico Gran Selezionetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Dalmatian Plavac Malitypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)

Dalmatian Plavac Mali is fuller and richer: high against medium-plus.

Where they are much the same

Just as useful: knowing which parts of the choice do not matter.

  • Sweetness: Similar — both low.
  • Tannin: Similar — both medium-plus.
  • Aromatic intensity: Similar — both medium.
  • Oak influence: Similar — both medium.
  • Floral character: Similar — both low.

Full side by side

DimensionChianti Classico Gran SelezioneDalmatian Plavac Mali
Spicelow (1/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Earthy charactertypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)low (1/5)
Aciditytypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium (3/5)
Perceived freshnesstypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically low-medium, ranging from low to medium (2/5)
Alcoholtypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Bodytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Fruit intensitytypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Savoury charactertypically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)
Texturetypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to medium-plus (4/5)typically high, ranging from medium-plus to high (5/5)
Sweetnesslow (1/5)low (1/5)
Tannintypically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)typically medium-plus, ranging from medium to high (4/5)
Aromatic intensitymedium (3/5)medium (3/5)
Oak influencetypically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)typically medium, ranging from low-medium to medium-plus (3/5)
Floral characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Herbal / green characterlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Carbonationlow (1/5)low (1/5)
Serve at16–18°C16–18°C
Typical flavoursblack cherry, leather, tobacco, dried herbs, espressoblackberry, dried fig, carob, black pepper, sea salt

Values are typical points within each wine’s range. Both wines vary — see the individual pages for how much.

Read more